Tuesday, 26 October 2010

obsessed by wikileaks julian assange

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/26/julian-assange-larry-king-ashamed_n_773976.html

http://www.montrealgazette.com/opinion/Protection+caregivers+focus+McGill+forum/2737963/ADHD+kids+linked+pesticide+exposure/3038755/WikiLeaks+founder+Julian+Assange+fears+marked/3719409/story.html


obsessed!!!!

larry king to julian assange
"rape is not trivial"

from salon.com:

It certainly appears that the case was handled poorly, but there is a whole lot we still don't know. Here's what I do know: Regardless of the validity of the specific claims against Assange, high-profile prosecutorial reversals and fumbles like this are a disservice to victims of sexual assault. They help perpetuate a distorted sense of the frequency of false accusations and contribute to the view of rape claims as a tool used to manipulate and destroy men. Ultimately, cases like this discourage victims from coming forward and only make it harder for women with legitimate claims of sexual assault to be taken seriously by police, prosecutors and the general public.

    Friday, 10 September 2010

    LAPD strikes again

    Sent: Fri, September 10, 2010 11:00:27 PM
    Subject: REPORT OF NLG/LA PRESS CONFERENCE ON LAPD SHOOTING DEATH AND MAYOR'S RESPONSE

    (jim lafferty has heroic dedication to justice. i hope he doesn't mind that i republish this amazing story from the NLG LA email. it is important that we address police brutality and racism as well as government cover-ups. i am so proud to have met him and become familiar with the los angeles lawyers guild and their tremendous work.)



    September 10, 2010
    Dear Board Members and LA/NLG Members and Legal Observers:
    I thought you would want to know that our press conference this morning in front of City Hall was extremely well attended. At least 20 members of the media were there. It seemed all of the radio and tv stations were present, along with AP. (We'll see what kind of actual coverage we get.)
    I announced that the purpose of the press conference was two-fold: 1) to speak to the matter of the Mayor's rush to judgment in the shooting death of Mr. Jamenez; and 2) to speak to how the LAPD has been responding to those peacefully protesting the shooting.
    With respect to the Mayor's statement that while "we've got to have an investigation," he was certain that when all was said and done it would show that the cops were "heroes," I said...in much more forceful language than I do here, that it was a despicable rush to judgment by a man who was not there, and that nevertheless saw fit to state with certainly facts very much in contention, and to then, after begrudgingly acknowledging the need for an investigation, announce to the City in advance of said investigation what the outcome would "certainly" be; and how inappropriate that was for the chief law enforcement official in the town. How, I said, can the community be expected to put any credence in an investigation who's outcome has already been foretold by the Mayor?
    I then asked Colleen Flynn to speak to how the LAPD has been responding to the protests over the shooting and she did a marvelous job of documenting the many and various abuses of the LAPD... the rubber bullets, the false arrests, the false charges, the rounding up of people simply standing in front of their homes, etc., etc.
    I also introduced a leader from the Guatemalan community who spoke eloquently of their long history at the hands of the LAPD and then also introduced two leaders from the immigrants rights community who spoke about the situation, as well.
    As luck would have it, just as we were finishing our press conference the Mayor stepped out from the front door of City Hall to go to the Mexican Day celebration taking place on the South lawn of City Hall near our press conference. I ran over and as the press gathered around the Mayor I said, in a very loud voice, words to this effect: "Mr. Mayor, why did you pre-judge the investigation of the shooting of Mr. Jaminez by saying that you were sure the investigation would find that the cops were heroes. How can the community have any faith in the investigation when you, who have no personal knowledge of the facts, have already proclaimed with certainly what the outcome will be? You are a lawyer...you should be ashamed of prejudicing the investigation as you have done."
    The press then picked up on my shouted statements to the Mayor (some of the same press who had covered our press conference were now trying to get to the Mayor)and asked the Mayor to respond. Basically what he said by way of response was this: "look, I speak my mind freely. When the police attacked the May Day protest I said I thought that was wrong...and so here I just gave my personal viewpoint, too." He was clearly on the defensive and the press kept pressing him on the point that I had made about prejudicing the investigation. And when they finished with him several tv and radio stations then asked for my reaction to the Mayor's explanation of why he said what he did. I said it was a lame excuse, at best. For the Mayor of a mayor City to not know how to control his own gut feelings in the wake of a killing of a resident of our City is shameful...and again said that as a consequence of his remarks the community would give little credence to whatever the investigation shows. I said, as well, that in light of the new eye witness statement to the effect that Mr. Jaminez was holding nothing in his hand when he was shot, the D.A. should conduct a more thorough investigation of this shooting than is usually the case and, if the facts justify it, prosecute officer Hernandez.
    Colleen then gave one last interview to Channel 52 and AP and I gave one last interview to City News Service and AP, and we left. (We also learned of some more witnesses as a result of today's press conference.)
    Regards, Jim Lafferty
    P.S. My thanks, as well, to the half-dozen or so Guild members who've made it their business to go the protests near Mac Arthur Park every night since the shooting. Yesterday we issued a statement drafted by Carol Sobel about the police conduct at the protests, and I had a frank conversation with Sarg. Jim Barker, and apparently last night the police did behave better towards the protesters.

    Wednesday, 7 April 2010

    found lisa jaskol!!
    she was amazing.
    told her i just regged for LSAT.
    she said get a prep course.
    i asked her if she knew disbartorturelawyers.com?
    she said LG supports the same agenda, disbarment for the architects of torture.

    sasasasweet! check this
    off
    women lawyers association of los angeles.
    cross reference to
    http://thereallacc.blogspot.com/
    http://www.wlala.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=7

    "Amicus Briefs 

    Chair:  Lisa Jaskol (ljaskol@publiccounsel.org) and Cynthia E. Tobisman (ctobisman@gmsr.comThe Amicus Committee evaluates pending cases raising legal and public policy issues affecting women, and, in those cases in which WLALA agrees to participate, prepares or edits amicus briefs on behalf of WLALA.  In recent years, WLALA has participated as an amicus in a number of precedent-setting cases, including Davis v. Monroe County, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that school districts may be held liable for their own deliberate indifference of student-on-student sexual harassment, and United States v. Morrison, in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared the civil rights remedy of the Violence against Women Act unconstitutional."

    pension discrimination in europe
    http://www.feministisktinitiativ.se/engelska.php?text=plattform

    i am not sure i agree with the word patriarchy
    look at the gestures regarding discrim across nation state and gender lines
    equality in norway
    http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/bld.html?id=298
    http://hlp.home.igc.org/
    humanitarian law project
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Enterprise_Terrorism_Act
    disbartorturelawyers.com, sigh
    http://www.disbartorturelawyers.com/
    ADA up-to-date for the cyborgian eras

    lawyers guild meeting los angeles

    lawyers guild meeting was so fun.
    http://www.nlg.org/
    i love ya!
    los angeles chapter
    http://www.nlg-la.org/
    discussed critical race theory, intersectionality, misogyny within the black panthers, labor law, activist law, legal observations.
    neo-nazi march coming soon.  may day.
    permits. police brutality.
    hugo chavez jailing a judge for releasing a prisoner.
    funny when everyone got so party line like let's protect the pro-chavez stance, talk to the international committee, then maybe talk to the national lawyer's guild.
    i was like, OMG, i'll go blog it ASAP, hello!
    human rights!
    man . . .
    i was sitting in the progressive nexus of the overall sort of progressive LA lawyer's guild.
    it was a special treat to me to be around like, twenty five really educated powerful affluent people.
    and so many powerful women.
    like rebecca thornton of the may day litigation. she's VP of the guild.
    so in awe of her work!!!!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_May_Day_mêlée
    oh my gosh i was there to watch the cops beat people!!!!!!
    2007.
    i was really keen on the fashion expression.
    one woman spoke of the human rights crises in the philippines and going there to observe the elections.

    betty hung was overwhelmingly articulate on labor law.
    and lisa . . . was so astute on the chavez obscuration where LG wants to kiss Chavez up, and ignore the human rights violation of imprisoning judges.
    she reminded me of bruce fein.
    a tough human rights kind of mind.

    jim lafferty is such the moderator extraordinaire.  my favorite thing he said, was i agree with everyone and no-one, or something like that.
    i think he must be a gemini.
    i can't wait to hear him on KPFK.
    so socially graceful!  i love this!

    this was gripping every second of the time, pure passion work!!! oh and so much laughter!!!!
    well---i had way too much fun.  2.5 hours of it exactly.
    hope to see them again.